He has no shame

He had the right to attend as ex-PM, but to do so shows he has no shame. The right to attend does not mean he was right to attend.Happy in Cyprus wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:02 pm Not standing up for Blair, because I am a harsh critic of the UK's Bush/WMD involvement in the Iraq War. However, Blair couldn't win whatever he did.
Had he stayed away, that would have been perceived as being an admission of culpability. And the media would have ripped him to shreds for not turning up to the commemoration event.
He wasn't Billy No Mates in the TV news clip last night, where he was seen talking to the military top brass next to him.
On balance he was right to attend.
The lack of an exit plan (post war plan) was on his watch, so he should be held responsible. Why didn't he ensure there was one?Hudswell wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:01 pm Blair had every right and was right to attend, it was his duty. Whilst not wishing to open up heated discussion in regard to the Gulf War in 2003, it causes much heated discussion and will continue to do so for many years to come, I was on the ground prior to, during and after the war fighting phase of the operation...there was a relative period of calm where there was a clear oppourtunity for the Iraqi people to take charge of their own destiny freed from the tyranny of Hussain, but they failed, instead they reverted back to the tribalism and hatred they knew. I still believe the war was just, unfortunetaly there was no post war plan, and that is where the failure lays.
Some would, but not as many.Hudswell wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:57 pmAnd Geoff, they still would have died because of the dictatorship at the helm...dammed if you, dammed if you don't....look at Syria.geoffreys wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:21 pmThe lack of an exit plan (post war plan) was on his watch, so he should be held responsible. Why didn't he ensure there was one?Hudswell wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:01 pm Blair had every right and was right to attend, it was his duty. Whilst not wishing to open up heated discussion in regard to the Gulf War in 2003, it causes much heated discussion and will continue to do so for many years to come, I was on the ground prior to, during and after the war fighting phase of the operation...there was a relative period of calm where there was a clear oppourtunity for the Iraqi people to take charge of their own destiny freed from the tyranny of Hussain, but they failed, instead they reverted back to the tribalism and hatred they knew. I still believe the war was just, unfortunetaly there was no post war plan, and that is where the failure lays.
As a result 100s of thousands have died since the Iraq war.
Nothing to do with whether the Iraq war was just or not.
Geoff.
Hudswell wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:31 pm Really? I suspect they may have..anyone willing to use chemical weapons on their own people are capable of anything....as I say we are dammed if we do and dammed if we don't...I am actually proud of our conduct and efforts in both Iraq and Afganistan...we gave the people space..what they did with that space is open to debate....I am not a great fan of Blair, he had potential, but lost his way...too good for labour by far..but like all things, hindsight is a wonderful gift..and actually I do think in Gulf War 1 we should have finished the job.