Cogs123 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:30 pm
I think it too simplistic to judge educational attainment as to the reason why Brexit happened. I would argue that
De-industrialisation/Globalisation played it's part in the vote.
I think you're right, and in more ways than one.
I was having a discussion with an acquaintance of mine [degree educated] who was explaining how his principles forced him to vote Leave. I pointed out that, whilst not wishing to impugn his integrity, I would have thought that the fact he was a barrister specializing in EU employment law might have had a slightly larger effect than he was giving it credit for.
Most people who have degrees tend to go into second order economic jobs, where they are not directly effected by trade. Doctors, lawyers, politicians, practically any job which requires an arts degree, etc., all tend to be only indirectly involved in economic activity. In fact a lot of their jobs are directly reliant on government legislation or funding in one way or another. Even graduates who do go straight into business tend to head for large corporates who welcome regulation to protect them from market destabilization. So if your job effectively requires large quantities of government intervention you are obviously going to vote for whatever guarantees more [or certainly not less] of it.
Those that go straight into commerce without bothering with a degree tend to be small or medium businesses in direct contact with their revenue generating customer base who have been most directly effected or even watched their businesses get destroyed by government regulation, EU customs tariffs and ever increasing globalisation, like the UK fishing industry, high street individual shops, niche importers/exporters, etc, effectively squeezing off the actual wealth generators.
Its also why the UK is 2 trillion in debt