Very commendable Hudswell, and having known you for several years now on several forums, not at all surprised about your reasons for joining the army.Hudswell wrote: ↑Sun Feb 05, 2017 6:21 pm Actually Keving, I probably did join the Army in order to defend my family, my friends and my country, and In that order. I did not understand that at the time, because yes it is a very exciting vocation, note I did not say job, and deploying on operations is extremely exciting and what we are trained to do. And you aim for the largest mass...the Chest area, and we were never trained "to shoot to wound" And Jonno, no need to waste ammunition, a 5.56 round to the chest region will put you down and you will stay down.
The Telegraph article above, and the quote contained within, refers to a problem in current recruitment.
I can well believe that a majority of current recruits sign up for reasons such as your own, but it appears that recruitment falls when there are no current operations.
By the way, I don't disagree with your use of the word vocation. I think anyone who goes into public service - whether nurse, doctor, teacher, fire fighter, social worker, military or politician, etc - who accepts a lower salary than they could have got in the private sector, has accepted a vocation to serve the public with all the challenges and criticism that often entails, and deserves the greatest respect. Kudos to you.