I think that's the funniest comment I've ever read

Jim
Lloyd, once again (now there's a surprise) you are purposely being obtuse. It’s getting a little tedious to repeat myself, but hopefully, sometime it'll sink in - although I won't be holding my breath. I don't give a fig how long you've been importing and exporting - ask Tate & Lyle (a far bigger importer/exporter than you will ever be and trading for around 150 years or more) what they believe to be the post Brexit future. They are totally supportive! Tate & Lyle prefer to buy cane sugar from the Caribbean, but this is subject to very high tariffs when being brought into the EU. Why? So that companies like Tate & Lyle are forced to buy - at inflated prices - EU produced sugar beet from non efficient EU farmers at equally inflated prices (but less so). It seems to me that you just want a simple, paperless life and are prepared for others to pay more in order to achieve it. Goods bought on the Global market (like Caribbean sugar cane) will be cheaper than those bought within the Single Market. Who ultimately pays the tariffs? The consumer, of course. Not you, the importer/exporter. The customer pays. Brazil produces ten times as many oranges as Spain, and Florida five times as many. Supply and demand states that in a free market the largest suppliers will give the best price. However - when was the last time you saw Brazilian oranges on the supermarket shelves? I've never seen them. Why? Because of tariffs, which impose a silly level of tariffs on Brazilian and Floridian oranges in order to force us to buy Spanish oranges from non efficient EU farmers.Happy in Cyprus wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:48 am
The above pearls of wisdom - misguided aspirations on your part - demonstrate that you had not got a clue how imports and exports work. One way or another I've been importing and exporting for nigh on 40 years.
Sorry Loyd, but I do NOT take it from you - especially as you appear to be confusing the Single Market and the Customs Union which are two totally separate things. The UK does not particularly wish to leave the Single Market, but we have been told (rather constantly and consistently) that we cannot be a member unless we accept the uncontrolled immigration of members of the EU - a rather nonsensical diktat, confusing free trade with free movement of people. Of course, Norway and Iceland are members of the Single Market but not members of the EU. We could follow this model, but don't wish to, because they pay through the nose for the ‘privilege’ of membership. Due to our asymmetric trade balance with the EU, we are totally unlike Norway and Iceland, and therefore are far more worthy of a tailor made deal to suit our particular circumstances. Not to grant such a deal will mean that all EU goods arriving in the UK from the EU will be subject to the same tariffs (or more) as the EU imposes on UK goods. As we import £310 Bn of goods from the EU, but export only £240 Bn, it surely doesn't take the wisdom of Solomon to work out who the loser would be in a trade war.Happy in Cyprus wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:48 am So take it from me, if and when the UK leaves the EU single market, then all goods arriving at, or leaving, the UK from the EU WILL be subject to Customs inspection; and duties and taxes - and possibly even tariffs - will be applied thereon.
So what? A small independent supermarket can buy from whoever it wants. However, the result is much higher prices. By teaming up with lots of other small supermarkets and forming NISA (National Independent Shopkeepers Association) the small supermarkets had a more limited stock available to sell, but they were able to sell it at much better prices because of their increased buying power.Poppy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:49 am I do agree that we have rather gone off the subject. I blame HIC!![]()
However I did promise one benefit a day of leaving the EU to JimB so here comes number 2
2) We are free to trade with whichever Country in the World at our own negotiated deal.
What this space tomorrow for no3!![]()
Au contraire, Dominic.Dominic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:05 am
So what? A small independent supermarket can buy from whoever it wants. However, the result is much higher prices. By teaming up with lots of other small supermarkets and forming NISA (National Independent Shopkeepers Association) the small supermarkets had a more limited stock available to sell, but they were able to sell it at much better prices because of their increased buying power.