Page 2 of 2

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:24 pm
by Firefly
I never used PP, although I was aware of it, and viewed it a couple of times. So therefore if there is a thread on PP, and it is duplicated on PL, why should it be locked when the majority of use don't belong to PP, and wouldn't have seen it ?

Jackie

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:39 pm
by PaphosAL
Have to agree with you strongly on that one, Jackie, as I use PP to the same level as Facebook, Twitter ét al, ie: zilch

Cheers- AL :)
ps: LIKE

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:53 pm
by Dominic
Firefly wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:24 pm I never used PP, although I was aware of it, and viewed it a couple of times. So therefore if there is a thread on PP, and it is duplicated on PL, why should it be locked when the majority of use don't belong to PP, and wouldn't have seen it ?

Jackie
All the information anybody needed had already been posted. All that was happening was a slagging match between two companies.

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2017 11:01 pm
by galexinda
It's not just Dominic who can delete a post. I did a a few days ago because I didn't want any trouble further down the line for myself or this forum because the topic was getting out of hand and I no longer wanted to be part of it. By the way Dominic I think this is the best forum - keep up the good work!

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 12:10 am
by markwoods39
Firefly wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:24 pm I never used PP, although I was aware of it, and viewed it a couple of times. So therefore if there is a thread on PP, and it is duplicated on PL, why should it be locked when the majority of use don't belong to PP, and wouldn't have seen it ?

Jackie
Have to agree with Jackie, but please admin move this to where you think is best :)

Re: Pl v PP

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:26 am
by Dominic
Just stop posting on it and it will soon drift away.