When I am out for rock hunting I am equipped with several hammer and different chisels but not with my camera. So all these photos are specimens I carried home, from sometimes large distances from where I found them back to my car. The crystals in this post one could not see them on the surface as they had to be dug out. What you could see was only parts of veins and underneath they appeared...
George, I suggest that you start a new topic for that question and wait for the answers from members or Dominic. I am using a German website, where I set to 1024 pixels for panoramic photos and 640 pixels for portrait pics.... the quality though is reduced from the originals (4-8 MB), but when they are not blurred it is good enough, I think.ph06kg1 wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 11:48 am Max, i wanted to ask you: how is it possible to upload so many pics of that great quality on Paphos life? In my case, it only lets me upload only 5 photos, and i have to reduce their size as well, and thats the reason i didnt post for a while because it is a little frustrating.. Thanks!!!
That explains a lot to me. Not only that one cannot recognize on a tiny screen, details of close up pics, (e.g. crystal inclusions) and also a certain mood (sunrise etc.) is not the same what I can see on my 42" screen. So now the use of a lot of bandwidth comes on top of it.Dominic wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:51 pm One thing you should bear in mind though is that if you continually put lots of pictures in a single thread, then people browsing using a mobile device (and in this day and age, that is a lot) may choose to avoid your threads. That is because they use up a lot of bandwidth.
